Seeing as how this is a presidential election year, I thought in the spirit of debate we would open up a discussion about something that has become a recurring topic in some of the comments on my blog lately. A few ground rules first. (1) No diverting from the topic. (2) Try, as much as possible, to leave your own feelings about a team or school, out of it. In other words, check your emotions at the door - or at least before your fingers start working the keyboard.
Alright, we good? Let's dive in. Here's the question:
Which would you rather be?
(A) Team that has steamrolled through it's tournament games;
(B) Team that has been involved with several highly contest match ups and come out victorious.
Now, the reason this conversation is relevant in the present is because tomorrow, the Brownsburg boys basketball team will face No. 1 New Albany, which is 26-0 on the year and have an average margin of victory of 22 points per game, in the Indiana high school state basketball tournament Class 4A semistate at Southport. The Bulldogs won their first three tournament games by 13, 17 and 17.
Does this mean that New Albany is just on another level? Certainly. But does it mean they can't be beat? No. As the old saying goes, any team can be beat on a given day.
But New Albany does present the argument for (A) above. The Bulldogs have been aggressive defensively; no school has scored more than 59 points on them this tournament. Plus, Jim Shannon's club is hungry in its own right, as New Albany has been close to advancing this far, but never made it out of regionals (two losses in the regional final in 2003 and 2007).
However, another group might argue that New Albany will eventually run into a team that gives them a close game. The question then becomes, how will the Bulldogs respond? Will they get tight? Will they wilt under the pressure?
Brownsburg has won its tournament games by 5, 7, 2, 4 and 4. The Bulldogs (yes, these two schools share a nickname) have been in pressure-packed situations throughout this postseason.
One could argue they are well-equipped at handling any situation that may arise this weekend, as evidenced by their nail-biting victories. Players like Julian Mavunga (who tallied 43 points and 30 rebounds last Saturday at regionals) and Gordon Hayward are building a reputation of coming through in the clutch.
Or you could argue that they've been flirting with the jaws of defeat. Or you could argue that they are tired and New Albany, by virtue of their blowouts, will have the fresher legs.
So what are your thoughts? Leave a comment below if you have more to say about this topic or would like to add to a point made already.
Personally, while I'm sure a little of both is true, I'm not sure which team is in the better position heading into tomorrow's showdown at Southport. I think they're both two great ballclubs and it should be a great game.
And no matter which team wins, I doubt this debate will be over anytime soon.
Be sure to check out HSSTM.com for all the high school happenings this weekend!


Posted by: Seth on Friday, March 14, 2008
When it comes to the NCAA Tournament, you always see teams that escape gain more and more confidence as a tournament goes on. I would have to side with the school of though that says it's better to have won a bunch of close games that to have never won them in the first place. It makes you seasoned if anything. Not to take anything away from New Albany, but you do see it happen a lot in high school and college where a team that is just blowing others out ends up getting shocked and unable to recover in a close one.
Posted by: Hambone on Friday, March 14, 2008
This is actually a really cool argument - and a good way to pass time in study hall. You guys do a great job and I really love the magazine!
Posted by: Braedan on Friday, March 14, 2008
Here's a follow-up question to this debate: Does where the game is played matter? Brownsburg is probably more familiar and more comfortable at Southport than New Albany. Will that factor in? Plus, I would guess Brownsburg (being so close) will have more fans make the trip tomorrow. Interesting. Hope that didn't stray too far from your "rules."
Posted by: Danny on Friday, March 14, 2008
This is fairly pretentious idea isn't it? Debating the value of what manner in which a team wins it's games? Well, luckily, I'm into that. It's clear that Brownsburg would fair better than New Albany if the game is close. Experience in those situations matter, which is why coaches practice and preach that throughout the season. But if New Albany is just that good, it may not matter.
Posted by: Jenn on Friday, March 14, 2008
Brownsburg 58, New Albany 55!!!!
Posted by: George II on Friday, March 14, 2008
ive got to think that two ofd these teams winning in different ways will have little to do with the outcome saturdya. so what if new abany has won a bunch of games by 20 points or whatever. and b-burg wont not win because they cant blow a team out. just hit your free throws